chellhoun:

please take me to jail
please

chellhoun:

please take me to jail

please

appropriately-inappropriate:

riotinglesbian:

genderpopo:

Yo, genderists.

Let me give you a laywoman’s introduction to the concept of root words, specifically in reference to the word you made up “transmisogynist”.

"Miso-/mis-/misia-" is Greek for hate, hater, hatred, disgust for

"Gyn-" is Greek for woman

Therefore, when you concocted the word “transmisogynist” you accidentally created a word that describes trans hatred for women.  The word you’re looking for is misotransgynist.

Thank you.

I am laughing so hard.

Oops.

never-obey:

xfairyprincex:

The struggle that all women have to deal with. 

I’m not a creep!! >:-(((

never-obey:

xfairyprincex:

The struggle that all women have to deal with. 

I’m not a creep!! >:-(((

disfiguredstick:

disfiguredstick:

image

This continues to get notes every day

shitpeoplenameintf2:

Pyro can do a pretty good Final Fantasy cosplay.

shitpeoplenameintf2:

Pyro can do a pretty good Final Fantasy cosplay.

appropriately-inappropriate:

mulledwine:

witchbornwitch:

notcisjustwoman:

plansfornigel:

Like Laverne Cox this idiot thinks that SRS is every man’s right regardless of past history of character. No. People with a proven history of violence should not be allowed to legally change gender or name.
I am so pro castration on demand, it hurts, but I don’t think violent people should be granted trans status. What’s at the heart of the so-called “bathroom debates” is this; convicted rapists and murderers are allowed to legally change gender. It is reasonable to assume that any transwoman may be a man with violent past cause he could be, child molesters are allowed to change gender.
How does this policy benefit ANYONE other than men with violent histories? Spoiler: IT DOESN”T. Trans politics needs a coup and a regime change, cause their shining golden girl Laverne Cox along with Sylvia Rivera Law Project is promoting policy that is no different from this jackass in the screen cap is saying.

There’s literally not a single violent male these fuckers won’t defend, is there? I mean, Hitler? Really?

What I don’t get is that they complain about stereotyping of trans women as murders, rapists, pedophiles etc. but like has it occurred to them that it might help if they stop supporting murders, rapists, pedophiles etc?

imagine if the LGB section started supporting the likes of Dahmer and Wuornos just because of their sexualities.

Would never happen. If nothing else, Gay Inc figured out the PR decades ago.
The Slytherin in me would point out that even IF, and that’s a huge IF, but even if some gay men supported Dahmer (which I doubt), they’d know better than to make a law project and have Rock Hudson defending him (or Elton John, though the fact that I’m even comparing Elton John to Laverne Cox is bad enough).
Ethics aside, it’s just bad PR. As someone said “you can’t complain about your community being perceived as rapists, paedophiles and murderers, and then advocate for rapists, paedophiles and murderers.”
If a lesbian had done the shit Morales did, I’d be the first to say she ought to be put down. That shit don’t fly in my community, oh no it does not.

appropriately-inappropriate:

mulledwine:

witchbornwitch:

notcisjustwoman:

plansfornigel:

Like Laverne Cox this idiot thinks that SRS is every man’s right regardless of past history of character. No. People with a proven history of violence should not be allowed to legally change gender or name.

I am so pro castration on demand, it hurts, but I don’t think violent people should be granted trans status. What’s at the heart of the so-called “bathroom debates” is this; convicted rapists and murderers are allowed to legally change gender. It is reasonable to assume that any transwoman may be a man with violent past cause he could be, child molesters are allowed to change gender.

How does this policy benefit ANYONE other than men with violent histories? Spoiler: IT DOESN”T. Trans politics needs a coup and a regime change, cause their shining golden girl Laverne Cox along with Sylvia Rivera Law Project is promoting policy that is no different from this jackass in the screen cap is saying.

There’s literally not a single violent male these fuckers won’t defend, is there? I mean, Hitler? Really?

What I don’t get is that they complain about stereotyping of trans women as murders, rapists, pedophiles etc. but like has it occurred to them that it might help if they stop supporting murders, rapists, pedophiles etc?

imagine if the LGB section started supporting the likes of Dahmer and Wuornos just because of their sexualities.

Would never happen. If nothing else, Gay Inc figured out the PR decades ago.

The Slytherin in me would point out that even IF, and that’s a huge IF, but even if some gay men supported Dahmer (which I doubt), they’d know better than to make a law project and have Rock Hudson defending him (or Elton John, though the fact that I’m even comparing Elton John to Laverne Cox is bad enough).

Ethics aside, it’s just bad PR. As someone said “you can’t complain about your community being perceived as rapists, paedophiles and murderers, and then advocate for rapists, paedophiles and murderers.”

If a lesbian had done the shit Morales did, I’d be the first to say she ought to be put down. That shit don’t fly in my community, oh no it does not.

perksofbeingafanboy:

what do people who aren’t obsessed with fictional characters do with their lives

Probably drive fast cars and have lots of sex or something stupid like that.

reallyreallyreallytrying:

behind every successful man is a cursed amulet and a mass grave of goat carcasses

Gender Brigader Bingo!

radicalmayhem:

bbrightstar:

safomis:

image

finally

beautiful